![maxqda v10 two transcript comparison maxqda v10 two transcript comparison](https://storj-s3.bcdn.literatehosting.net/original/2X/6/6e445d56e304479d5b4f53b15b40b1a527e1b2f4.png)
While ‘code existence’ provided an overview of comparison between the two researchers’ coding, the ‘segment agreement’ was used to do an in-depth review of the coding.
#MAXQDA V10 TWO TRANSCRIPT COMPARISON CODE#
When utilizing the inter-coder agreement, the code existence and segment agreement were calculated. The researchers were allowed to discuss the coding process while coding these interviews, to clarify any confusions or misunderstandings.
![maxqda v10 two transcript comparison maxqda v10 two transcript comparison](https://www.maxqda.com/wp/wp-content/themes/max/img/max20/max2020-import-transcripts.png)
Next, two researchers coded the same five interviews and utilized the inter-coder agreement function on these interviews. The codes fell into areas of interest such as “purpose of ” or “site functions most useful.” Code definitions were created for each code, using the code memo feature. First, a unified list of codes was developed based on research questions and the themes that were arising from the initial review of interviews. Two researchers were specifically dedicated to coding, under the supervision of a third researcher. Using “Intercoder Agreement” to Improve the Code SystemĪfter completing transcription of the interviews, the research team began the coding process. Der Blogbeitrag geht auf die Nutzung der „Intercoder Agreement“-Funktion von MAXQDA 12 ein und beschreibt, wie sie die Arbeit des Teams bereichert hat. Diese erfolgt mit der Unterstützung von weiteren vier Research Associates. Das Team des Evaluation Project hat seine Arbeit mit MAXQDA fortgesetzt ( hier finden Sie den ersten Blogbeitrag des Teams) und zwei unabhängig Forschende mit der Evaluation beauftragt.